【Citi & Finance】The iTunes Monopoly/Failure Myth Part 1(Republish)

 

"A monopoly does not refer to the popularity of a product, but rather the control of a market. ..... "

"Apple has no monopoly position that denies competitors from offering similar products. The iPod is sold on retail shelves next to competing players. Apple didn’t dump iPods upon the public as loss leaders, consumers voted with their dollars.
 
Similarly, iTunes software wasn’t tied into a monopoly operating system for anticompetitive distribution; it was sought out and downloaded by most users in the same manner as the Firefox browser."

----------------------------------------------------------------

This is a very good article in trying to explain why iPod/ITMS is not monopoly, despite of the fact that he is a big Apple fan, the article itself really make sence.  Inside the article,he really takes some serious and economic view on monopoly issue on MIcrosoft, as well as At&t. You should take a look at it, if you are interested on economics, or you are just a Mac fan.

The iTunes Monopoly/Failure Myth(Part 1) by Daniel Eran published on RDM

44169|Apple|iTunes|monopoly
纬度 发表于9/23/2006 2:01:47 AM
View blogs in this category:Citi & Finance


Wuvist 在 9/23/2006 7:44:51 AM 说:
如果说……apple  被认定为  市场垄断者,它是一家美国公司,那么,会有反垄断法对付水果牌……说不定就赔上个几亿元什么的……
所以,我作为一个水果牌信徒,我认为 水果牌 被认为 不是垄断者,是一件非常好的事情。

Please leave your comment here   大名:
  主页:
  内容: